Everything about Faustus Socinus totally explained
Fausto Paolo Sozzini, also known as
Faustus Socinus (
December 5,
1539 –
March 4,
1604) was an
Italian theologian and founder of the school of Christian thought known as "
Socinianism", based on the Latinized spelling of his name.
Sozzini was born at
Siena, the only son of Alessandro Sozzini and Agnese, a descendant of
Pandolfo Petrucci.
His father died in 1541, in his thirty-second year. Fausto had no regular education, being brought up at home with his sister Fillide, and spent his youth in desultory reading at Scopeto, the family country-seat. To the able women of his family he owed the strong moral impress which marked him through life; his early intellectual stimulus came from his uncle Celso, a nominal
Roman Catholic, but an
esprit fort, founder of the short-lived Accademia del Sizienti (1554), of which young Fausto was a member.
In
1556 his grandfather's will, leaving him one-fourth of the family estates, made him independent. Next year he entered the Accademia degli intronati, the centre of intellectual life in Siena. About this time Panzirolo (
De claris legg. interpp., first, published 1637) describes him as a young man of fine talent, with promise of a legal career; but he despised the law, preferring to write
sonnets.
In 1558-1559 the suspicion of
Lutheranism fell on him in common with his uncles Celso and Camillo. Coming of age (1561) he went to Lyon, probably engaging in mercantile business; he revisited Italy after his uncle Lelio's death; we find him in 1562 on the roll of the Italian church at
Geneva; there's no trace of any relations with Calvin; to
Lyon he returned next year. The evangelical position wasn't radical enough for him. In his
Explicatlo (1562) of the proem to
St John's Gospel he already attributes to our Lord an official, not an essential, deity; a letter of 1563 rejects the natural immortality of man (a position subsequently developed in his disputation with Pucci).
Towards the end of 1563 he returned to Italy, conforming to the
Roman Catholic Church, and for twelve years, as, his unpublished letters show, was in the service of
Isabella de Medici, daughter of the grand-duke Cosimo of Tuscany (not, as Przypkowski says, in the service of the grandduke). This portion of his life he regarded as wasted; till 1567 he gave some attention to legal duties, and at the instance of a great personage wrote (1570) his treatise
De auctoritate s. scripturae.
In
1571 he was in
Rome, probably with his patroness. He left Italy at the end of 1575, and after Isabella's death (strangled by her husband in 1576) he declined the overtures of her brother Francesco, now grand-duke, who pressed him to return. Francesco was doubtless aware of the motive which led Sozzini to quit Italy; there's every reason to believe
Przypkowski's statement that the grand-duke agreed to secure to him the income of his property so long as he published nothing in his own name.
Sozzini now fixed himself at
Basel, gave himself to close study of the
Bible, began translating the
Psalms into Italian verse, and, in spite of increasing deafness, became a centre of theological debates. His discussion with
Jacques Couet on the doctrine of salvation issued in a treatise
De Jesu Christo servatore (finished
July 12,
1578), the circulation of which in manuscript commended him to the notice of
Giorgio Blandrata, court physician in
Poland and
Transylvania, and ecclesiastical wire puller in the interests of
heterodoxy.
Transylvania had for a short time (1559-1571) enjoyed full religious liberty under an anti-Trinitarian prince,
John Sigismund. The existing ruler, Christopher Bathori, favoured the
Jesuits; it was now Blandrata's object to limit the Judaic tendencies of the eloquent anti-Trinitarian bishop,
Francis David (1510-1579), with whom he'd previously co-operated. A charge of the gravest sort against Blandrata's morals had destroyed his influence with David. Hence he called in Sozzini to reason with David, who had renounced the worship of Christ. In Sozzini's scheme of doctrine, terms in themselves orthodox were employed in a heretical sense.
In matter of worship Sozzini distinguished between
adoratio Christi, the homage of the heart, imperative on all Christians, and
invocatio Christi, the direct address of prayer, which was simply permissive (Blandrata would have made it imperative); though in Sozzini's view, prayer, to whomsoever addressed, was received by Christ as mediator, for transmission to the father.
In November
1578 Sozzini reached
Kolozsvar (Klausenburg) from Poland, and did his best, during a visit of four months and a half under David's roof, to argue him into this modified doctrine of invocation. The upshot was that David from the pulpit exerted all his powers in denouncing all cultus of Christ. His civil trial followed, on a charge of innovation. Sozzini hurried back to Poland before it began. He can't be accused of complicity with what he calls the lage of Blandrata; he was no party to David's incarceration at Deva, where the old man miserably perished in less than three months. He was willing that David should be prohibited from preaching pending the decision of a general
synod; and his references to the case show that (as in the later instances of Jacobo Paleology, Christian Franken and Martin Seidel) theological aversions, though they never made him uncivil, froze up his native kindness and blinded his perceptions of character.
Blandrata ultimately conformed to the Catholic Church; hence Sozzini's laudatory dedication to him (1584) of his
De Jesu Christi natura, in reply to the Calvinist
Andrew Wolan, though printed in his works, wasn't used. The remainder (1579-1604) of Sozzini's life was spent in Poland. Excluded at first by his views on
baptism (which he regarded as applicable only to Gentile converts) from the Minor or anti-Trinitarian Church (largely
anabaptist), he acquired by degrees a predominant influence in its synods. He converted the
Arians from their avowal of our Lord's pre-existence, and from their rejection of the
invocatio Christi. He repressed the semi-Judaizers whom he failed to convince. Through correspondence with friends he directed also the policy of the anti-Trinitarian Church of Transylvania.
Forced to leave Cracow in
1583, he found a home with a Polish noble,
Christopher Morsztyn, whose daughter Elizabeth he married (1586). She died in the following year, a few months after the birth of a daughter, Agnese (1587-1654), afterwards the wife of
Stanislas Wiszowaty, and the progenitress of numerous descendants. In
1587 the grand-duke Francesco died; to this event Sozzini's biographers attribute the loss of his Italian property, but his unpublished letters show that he was on good terms with the new grand-duke, Ferdinando. Family disputes had arisen respecting the interpretation of his grandfather's wife; in October 1590 the
holy office at
Siena disinherited him, allowing him a pension, apparently never paid.
Failure of supplies from Italy dissolved the compact under which his writings were to remain anonymous, and he began to publish in his own name. The consequence was that in
1598 a mob expelled him from Cracow, wrecking his house, and grossly ill-using his person. Friends gave him a ready welcome at
Luslawice, 30 miles east from Cracow; and here, having long been troubled with colic and the stone, he died on
March 4,
1604. A limestone block with illegible inscriptions marks his grave. His engraved portrait is prefixed to his works (the original isn't extant); an oil-painting, formerly at Siena, can't be considered authentic.
Sozzini's works, edited by his grandson
Andrew Wiszowaty and the learned printer
F. Kuyper, are contained in two closely printed folios (Amsterdam, 1668). They rank as the first two volumes of the
Bibliotheca fratrum polonorum, though the works of
Hans Krell and
Jonas Schlichting were the first of the series to be printed. They include all Sozzini's extant theological writings, except his essay on predestination (in which he denies that God foresees the actions of free agents) prefixed to
Castellios Dialogi IV (1575, reprinted 1613) and his revision of a school manual
Instrumentum doctrinarum aristotelium (1586).
His pseudonyms, easily interpreted, were Felix Turpio Urhevetanus, Prosper Dysidaeus, Gratianus Prosper and Gratianus Turpio Gerapolensis (Senensis). Some of his early verse is in
Ferentillis Scielta di stanze di diversi autori toscani (1579, 1594); other specimens are given in Cant and in the Athenaeum (Aug. II, 1877); more are preserved at Siena.
Sozzini eonsidered that his ablest work was his
Contra atheos, which perished in the riot at Cracow (1598). Later he began, but left incomplete, more than one work designed to exhibit his system as a whole.
His reputation as a thinker must rest upon the
De auctoritate scripturae sacrae (1570) and
De Jesu Christo servatore (1578). The former was first published (Seville, 1588) by López, a Jesuit, who claimed it as his own, but prefixed a preface maintaining (contrary to a fundamental position of Sozzini) that man by nature has a knowledge of God. A French version (1592) was approved by the ministers of Basel; the English translation by
Edward Coombe (1731) was undertaken in consequence of the commendation in a charge (1728) by
Bishop Smaibroke, who observes that
Grotius had borrowed from it in his
De veritate Christ. rel.. In small compass it anticipates the historical argument of the credibility writers; in trying it by modern tests, it should be remembered that Sozzini, regarding it (1581) as not adequately meeting the cardinal difficulties attending the proof of the Christian religion, began to reconstruct its positions in his
Lectiones sacrae (unfinished). His treatise on the Saviour renders a real service to theology, placing orthodoxy and
heresy in new relations of fundamental antagonism, and narrowing the conflict to the main personal benefit of religion.
Of the person of Christ in this treatise he says nothing; its one topic is the work of Christ, which in his view operates upon man alone; the theological sagacity of Sozzini may be measured by the persistency with which this idea tends to recur. Though his name has been attached to a school of opinion, he disclaimed the rôle of a
heresiarch, and declined to give his unreserved adhesion to any one sect. His confidence in the conclusions of his own mind has earned him the repute of a
dogmatist; but it was his constant aim to reduce and simplify the fundamentals of Christianity. Not without some ground does the memorial tablet at Siena (inscription by
Brigidi, 1879) characterize him as vindicator of human reason against the supernatural.
Of his non-theological doctrines the most important is his assertion of the unlawfulness not only of war, but of the taking of human life in any circumstances. Hence the comparative mildness of his proposals for dealing with religious and anti-religious offenders, though it can't be said that he'd grasped the complete theory of toleration. Hence, too, his contention that magisterial office is unlawful for a Christian.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Faustus Socinus'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://fausto_paolo_sozzini.totallyexplained.com">Fausto Paolo Sozzini Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
